Editorial Policy, Methodology and Disclosures
Effective 8 October 2026
IPO GMP Online explains software used for stock research, investment analysis and trading workflows in India. It is an educational publication. Our content does not recommend individual securities, claim guaranteed trading results or replace a regulated investment adviser.
Our evaluation methodology
We compare documented product features and publicly accessible vendor information. The main listicle uses a transparent editorial weighting: fundamental research usefulness (25%), technical screening capability (20%), ease of use (20%), research workflow and context (15%), pricing and free tier (10%), and transparency and Indian market fit (10%). This framework describes editorial priorities. It is not the result of controlled software performance benchmarks, audited user studies, return backtests or proprietary product access. We never assign fabricated ratings or imply hands-on testing that did not occur.
How we handle sources and updates
We prioritise official vendor pricing pages, feature descriptions and disclosed update schedules. Prices and plans can change between checks; we identify dates and link to the source. We do not treat a marketing claim as a verified measure of performance. Where an exact current price or capability cannot be confirmed, our content directs readers to the official page instead of inventing a number. We plan to revisit key buyer guides regularly, but cannot guarantee all facts remain current between updates.
Publisher affiliation disclosure
Important: The publisher of IPO GMP Online is associated with Bullrun (bullrun.co.in), a product featured and ranked #1 in our stock screener listicle. The connection is relevant to readers evaluating our recommendations and may represent a conflict of interest. Our rankings are editorial positioning based on stated criteria, not independent product certification. We also identify situations where competitors are a stronger fit and disclose Bullrun's end-of-day technical scanner limitation.
No fabricated customer ratings
We do not currently display numerical user scores or star ratings. Such scores would need an auditable collection and moderation process. The site instead uses stated use-case recommendations, published product data, and limitations. It does not claim to be registered with SEBI or to provide regulated investment advice.
Research and source pages
- Bullrun technical scanner
- Screener.in premium
- Trendlyne subscription
- Chartink subscription
- Tickertape pricing
- StockEdge pricing
- TradingView pricing
- Finology ONE subscription
Corrections and independence of judgment
Corrections should follow primary documents or vendor evidence. We avoid unsupported superiority claims and label subjectively ordered recommendations. Because this static release has no back-end submission form, contact details have deliberately not been invented. Add a verified editorial contact address before launching a public corrections inbox.
Financial risk disclaimer
Trading and investing involve the potential loss of capital. The website is for research education and software selection, not personalised advice. Historical ratios, screens, indicator signals and AI-generated explanations are not predictions and do not guarantee profitable outcomes. Users must verify disclosures and determine suitability independently.